French
Spanish
GLOBAL MOVEMENT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE

On the left below, please find an article for the Culture of Peace News Network and on the right the discussion related to this article. You are invited to read and join in the discussion by clicking on any of the questions listed here, or, if you wish, you may enter a new discussion question as described on the bottom of this page. Please take the time to check one of the boxes below as to whether this article should be given a high priority, a medium priority or no priority

Learn Write Read Home About Us Discuss Search Subscribe Contact
by program area
by region
by category
by recency
United Nations and Culture of Peace
Global Movement for a Culture of Peace
Values, Attitudes, Actions
Rules of the Game
Submit an Article
Become a CPNN Reporter


Nonviolent Peaceforce Statement On Framework Agreement On The Bangsamoro (FAB) Signing (Philippines)
an article by Nonviolent Peaceforce

A crucial and long-awaited step on the path to peace in the Philippines was made on 25 January 2014 when the Government of the Philippines (GPH) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) signed the final annex and addendum for the Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro (FAB). The FAB was initiated on 15 October 2012. In the 15 months following, the MILF and GPH engaged in ongoing dialogue and complex negotiations to finalize this agreement. This agreement paves the way for an autonomous Bangsamoro state. Now that all points in the FAB have been agreed upon, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement can be signed by the GPH and MILF. Therefore the country can move forward to the next phase of the peace process, developing Bangsamoro Basic Law.


Photo: Miriam Coronel-Ferrer, seated left, chairperson of Philippine Government Peace Panel, and Mohagher Iqbal, seated right, chief negotiator for the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), sign documents with Malaysian facilitator Abdul Ghafar Tengku Mohamed, sitting center, as witness, during the 43rd GPH-MILF Exploratory Talks in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Saturday, Jan. 25, 2014. AP PHOTO/LAI SENG SIN

click on photo to enlarge

This monumental event is the result of peace talks between the GPH and MILF. This was done under the facilitation and support of Malaysia and the highly credible work of the International Monitoring Team (IMT) in Mindanao.

Nonviolent Peaceforce (NP) has had the privilege of being part of one component of the IMT, the Civilian Protection Component (CPC) since its creation in 2010. As a member of the IMT-CPC, NP is charged with carrying out the CPC mandate. This focuses on civilian safety and security in situations of armed conflict.

Nonviolent Peaceforce was invited to Mindanao by the Mindanao Peoples’ Caucus and Consortium of Bangsamoro Civil Society and deployed its team in May 2007. This established the first international field presence in the most critical conflict areas of Datu Piang and Jolo, Sulu. Nonviolent Peaceforce teams are out in Mindanao every day, addressing concrete problems on the ground. This includes de-escalating tensions, supporting peace panels and giving IMT real time reports. This ground breaking work in the Philippines resulted in the Nonviolent Peaceforce being invited to Myanmar to support local initiatives for effective ceasefire monitoring.

While the signing of the FAB is a success for the Philippines as a country, it most directly impacts the people of Mindanao. Mindanao is the second largest island in the Philippines and has lived through decades of violent conflict as well as numerous failed peace agreements.

The finalisation of the FAB is a significant step in resolving a historic conflict and bringing a new era of peace, for the citizens of Mindanao and the country of the Philippines. The Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, Teresita Quintos Deles, shared these words following the successful conclusion of the FAB, “In a world looking for peaceful solutions to all troubles, we are grateful that we have found ours. Let us all seal it and nurture it. The best is yet to come.”

NP extends heartfelt congratulations to the MILF, GPH and all the actors involved in the peace process. This also extends to the dedicated champions of these parties who continued to persevere and the people of Mindanao for achieving peaceful resolution.

See the full text of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, Teresita Quintos Deles here.

DISCUSSION

Question(s) related to this article:


What is the latest update on the peace situation in Mindanao?,

* * * * *

LATEST READER COMMENT:

The agreement of October 15 2012 has given rise to optimism, but many problems remain.  For a typical analysis see that of The Economist.

The Philippines' Southern Insurgency

It could be peace

Hopes grow for an end to a bloody and long-running insurgency

AFTER 16 years of on-and-off negotiations, the Philippines government and the main Muslim rebel group in the southern region of Mindanao, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, agreed to the outlines of a peace deal on October 6th. The two sides are due to sign it formally on October 15th. If it works, which is far from guaranteed, it could bring an end to more than four decades of fighting by armed Muslims seeking independence from the mainly Christian archipelago nation. The Mindanao conflict has killed perhaps 120,000 people and displaced 2m more. Mindanao is home to most of the country’s Muslims, who make up about 5% of the population of about 100m.

The agreement is not a final peace deal, but rather what President Benigno Aquino describes as “a framework agreement” and the front calls a “road map”. Yet both sides believe that it paves the way for what Mr Aquino hopes will prove “a final, enduring peace” in Mindanao.

The peace plan envisages the establishment of an autonomous Muslim area in Mindanao, called Bangsamoro, subject to a plebiscite there. The proposed Bangsamoro will have budgetary autonomy and a just share of revenues from the extraction of southern resources; its own police force; and sharia law for Muslims only. In exchange for autonomy, the front will end its armed campaign for independence. The national government will retain control over foreign policy and national security.

All fine stuff. But the government and the rebels have yet to agree on the details. It will be the task of a joint commission to draft a basic law for Bangsamoro that sets out the structure of government. The peace plan envisages that Bangsamoro will be slightly larger than the present Muslim autonomous area of Mindanao, which was set up in 1996 as part of a peace accord with the front?s predecessor as standard-bearer of Muslim independence, the Moro National Liberation Front. The present autonomous area became such a sink of violence and corruption that Mr Aquino?s government took it over.

Some evident problems remain to be sorted out. Fiercely protective local politicians in Christian-dominated parts of Mindanao are already twitching, lest any attempt be made to encroach on what they regard as their territory. The peace plan speaks of ?decommissioning? rebel forces, thought by the government to number 11,000 armed fighters. This will be crucial, since the big flaw with earlier accords was that, although some fighters were taken into the army and police, others were left roaming the country. Peace is unlikely to take hold unless the front?a hardly cohesive agglomeration of warlords?can get its members to stick to the process. Already, one breakaway faction, the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement, has rejected peace negotiations and has been violating a ceasefire. Nor will a peace settlement cover myriad armed groups in Mindanao?some gangsters, some Islamist militants, many both.

Assuming negotiators can get around such obstacles, the government hopes to have Bangsamoro established by the time Mr Aquino steps down in 2016. It may take longer. Yet patience will not be infinite, and that is why the peace plan, incomplete as it is, is being presented for signing now. Likewise, the insurgency?s leaders must quickly produce something to show for the years of hardship that their followers have endured. Otherwise they risk pushing younger Muslims into the arms of Islamist extremists. America regards one group of Filipino militants, Abu Sayyaf, with al-Qaeda links, as terrorists. Several hundred American troops are in Mindanao helping Philippine forces stamp the group out. In the long run the government hopes peace will allow Mindanao?s agricultural and mineral wealth to be exploited, so that prosperity banishes all thoughts of militancy and conflict. America says it is ready to pour aid into Mindanao if peace holds.

The prospect of peace in Mindanao has quickly prompted speculation about whether this model could help resolve other long-running insurgencies in South-East Asia. Violence has spiked again this year in the deep south of Thailand where, as in Mindanao, armed Muslim groups have spent decades fighting for an independent Pattani state. In Myanmar, armed militias from ethnic groups such as the Karen and Kachin have been battling for some independence from central Burman authority for five or more decades.

The Mindanao model

The Mindanao peace plan advances a sort of federal formula as the compromise solution. Central government will concede a high degree of autonomy to would-be separatists, but retain sovereignty. Highly centralised states, such as Thailand, can barely contemplate this. Yet it worked in Aceh province in Indonesia in 2005, in some ways a precursor to the Mindanao deal. If it works in the Philippines, then more Thais, particularly in the powerful army, might just be persuaded of its merits. But the prospects are better in Myanmar. The generals there have studied Aceh closely, and peace in Mindanao might push them to consider similar arrangements in their own country. Furthermore, the principal mediator in the Mindanao deal was Malaysia, showing that new constitutional arrangements can be brokered by well-meaning locals.


This report was posted on February 5, 2014.