|
|
Non-Killing: A dangerous idea?
an article by Tony
BOOK REVIEW
Nonkilling Global Political Science
Glenn D. Paige
Center for Global Non-Violence
Honolulu, Hawaii
267 Pages
Web Source: globalnonviolence
It's a marvel. The same information technology that enables modern
warfare to deliver an intercontinental ballistic missile at supersonic
speed allowed me to access Glenn Paige's book about non-killing from
his website in less than 30 seconds.
Paige
believes the same methods now used by political scientists to promote
and justify killing could be used to give birth to a world in which
non-killing is the norm. Killing, the author points out, is not a
biological imperative or a sociological necessity to keep peace and
order in society. Rather, it is a political construct so ingrained that
it is rarely questioned even in academic circles.
In six
chapters and four Appendices he asks: What if tomorrow non-killing were
the norm? How would the Hitlers of the world be kept at bay? How would
cooperative problem-solving among nations replace war as a conflict
resolution mechanism? What kind of educational institutions would be
needed for promote non-violence? How could a non-violent world be
brought about? What are the philosophical and religious roots of
non-violence. What are working examples of non-violence including
nations which have outlawed capital punishment? These profound
questions raised by Paige have been swimming in my head ever since I've
starting reading his book.
Despite the seemingly impossible task
of changing laws, institutions, and political power to actively promote
nonkilling, the optimism and sense of urgency expressed in Paige's work
won me over. Killing has resulted in the deaths of 200 million people
killed in the internal and external wars in the 20th century without
achieving the goal of making the world safe. On the contrary, wars have
impoverished us all ecologically, morally and financially. There are so
many ways to pursue peace. If we develop the will, there is certainly a
way to a nonkilling world. In his book Nonkilling Global Political
Science , Glenn Paige has given us a valuable guide.
|
|




 

 |
DISCUSSION
Question(s) related to this article:
Are nonkilling societies possible
As a reader, you are invited to join in the discussion of
this article based on any of the above question(s): just click on the
question, read the previous comments and add a new reply. You may also
enter a new discussion topic on this article - see bottom of this page.
Thematic forum(s) in which this article is being discussed:
NON-VIOLENCE
Latest reader comment:
I
wanted to pass on some good news found in Christian Science Monitor,
1/12/07: "The number of conflicts in Africa has dropped to just five in
2005, from a peak of 16 in 2002." Ann McLaughlin, Director, NGOabroad
|
|
|
This report was posted on September 26, 2003. The moderator is Helen.
If you wish to start a new discussion topic on this article, please copy the title of this article which is Non-Killing: A dangerous idea? and its number which is 81 and enter this information along with your discussion question and a brief text on the new topic form.

A few stories are retained on the main listings if they are considered
by readers to be a priority. If you have not already done so, please
take the time to check a box below: should this article be considered
as a priority?

|