|
French Spanish |
|
On the left below, please find an article for the Culture of Peace News Network and on the right the discussion related to this article. You are invited to read and join in the discussion by clicking on any of the questions listed here, or, if you wish, you may enter a new discussion question as described on the bottom of this page. Please take the time to check one of the boxes below as to whether this article should be given a high priority, a medium priority or no priority |
|
Two Modes of UN Peacebuilding
After I read the article I was surprised that the two modes had quite a few differences such as different aims, Integrated mode depends more on help from the United Nations than the Hierarchical mode, and both modes do not remove the cause of violence in the country entirely, but sets up peaceful ways to deal with the cause of violence.
A point the author made was at the end there are four research questions that we can ask of the two modes: What does the Sierra Leone experience tell us about the merits and challenges of each mode? To what extent is the hierarchical mode insufficient and the integrated mode necessary for peace building success? To what extent is civil society engagement and popular inclusion necessary for successful peace building? What are the institutional obstacles that impede the UN from adopting the integrated mode?
Each question is critical about the UN modes of Peace building and how affective they are. To me both modes have their pros and cons and both do their best to help the country build peace. If a person reads this article when they are finished they should have a good opinion on UN Peacebuilding and how each mode is as the author put it, “two opposite ends of a spectrum and any present and future UN Peace missions will fall somewhere in between”(Lawrence).
|
|
DISCUSSION * * * * *
Latest reader comment: |
||||
|
This report was posted on .
|
||||||